![[RTEMS Logo]](/images/logo.png){kind=logo}
Opened on 12/02/18 at 16:01:32
Closed on 04/28/20 at 01:45:51
#3630 closed defect (fixed)
Build of rtems-tools fails with i686-w64-mingw32
| Reported by: | Markus Bernd Moessner | Owned by: | Chris Johns |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 5.1 |
| Component: | arch/arm | Version: | 5 |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
| Blocking: |
Description
Hi,
I am following
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/user/hosts/windows.html
to build a Windows Host toolchain on Linux Mint 19. However, the build of rtems-tools fails with: "unknown host: i686-w64-mingw32".
I can track the issue down to the function "check_options" in the wscript. The function expects a host called "mingw32" or "x86_64-w64-mingw32". My naive solution would be to simply extend the list with "i686-w64-mingw32", but I've just started with RTEMS so I might have choosen a wrong path in an earlier step.
Attachments (2)
Change History (9)
Changed on 12/02/18 at 16:05:51 by Markus Bernd Moessner
| Attachment: | rsb-report-rtems-tools-6db01e577fed1dc88018106b81dd531f2ecc1fd0-1.txt added |
|---|
Changed on 12/02/18 at 16:06:58 by Markus Bernd Moessner
| Attachment: | 0001-Allow-build-with-i686-w64-mingw32.patch added |
|---|
Patch to allow build of rtems-tools with i686-w64-mingw32
comment:1 Changed on 12/03/18 at 09:13:10 by Markus Bernd Moessner
| Component: | admin → arch/arm |
|---|
comment:2 Changed on 12/03/18 at 19:15:43 by Markus Bernd Moessner
Build works fine with a 64bit toolchain. The reason why I was using i686 was the example given in
https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/rsb/cross-canadian-cross.html#cross-building
comment:3 Changed on 12/04/18 at 03:23:36 by Chris Johns
| Milestone: | → 5.1 |
|---|---|
| Owner: | set to Chris Johns |
| Status: | new → accepted |
Thanks. I will update the documentation and will close the ticket when I commit the change.
comment:4 follow-up: 5 Changed on 12/06/18 at 21:00:30 by Markus Bernd Moessner
Dear Chris,
sorry for getting back on this, but the question that I have is: is it intendend / expected that the build fails with the i686 toolchain? If not - then i'll look into it and submit a patch. If it is expected - well yeah please update the documentation.
Thanks & Regards
Markus
comment:5 Changed on 12/09/18 at 23:41:50 by Chris Johns
Replying to Markus Bernd Moessner:
sorry for getting back on this, but the question that I have is: is it intendend / expected that the build fails with the i686 toolchain?
No it is not. It is a simple matter of there being limited time and many possible combinations.
If not - then i'll look into it and submit a patch. If it is expected - well yeah please update the documentation.
Updates are most welcome. Thank you.
comment:6 Changed on 12/10/18 at 16:57:22 by Markus Bernd Moessner
Ok, thank you for taking the time to clarify this.
comment:7 Changed on 04/28/20 at 01:45:51 by kaidoho <kho237115@…>
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | accepted → closed |
In [changeset:"a1a05c7c630529e90fab632c6750bb2e825538b6/rtems-tools" a1a05c7/rtems-tools]:
RSB Report