#1936 closed enhancement
RFE: Abandon ualarm
Reported by: | Ralf Corsepius | Owned by: | Joel Sherrill |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 4.11 |
Component: | unspecified | Version: | 4.11 |
Severity: | minor | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
Blocking: |
Description (last modified by Joel Sherrill)
POSIX.1-2001 marks ualarm() as obsolete and POSIX.1-2008 removes the specification of ualarm().
In short: RTEMS should stop supporting ualarm and it be removed from the source tree, if feasible (I haven't checked).
10 years of legacy support should be enough.
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed on 10/13/11 at 16:27:19 by Ralf Corsepius
comment:2 Changed on 11/21/14 at 17:00:09 by Joel Sherrill
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Resolution: | → wontfix |
Status: | new → closed |
Nah.. if Fedora 20 still supports it, I don't see why we should drop it.
comment:3 Changed on 11/24/14 at 18:58:28 by Gedare Bloom
Version: | HEAD → 4.11 |
---|
Replace Version=HEAD with Version=4.11 for the tickets with Milestone >= 4.11
comment:4 Changed on 10/10/17 at 06:46:55 by Sebastian Huber
Component: | testing → unspecified |
---|
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
POSIX.1-2001 marks ualarm() as obsolete and POSIX.1-2008 removes the specification of ualarm().
In short: RTEMS should stop supporting ualarm and it be removed from the source tree, if feasible (I haven't checked).
10 years of legacy support should be enough.