Changes between Version 23 and Version 24 of Projects/GSoC/TestingReview

Timestamp:

07/08/12 09:25:46 (12 years ago)

Author:

Xiaochen Pan

Comment:

/* Comparison Note */

Projects/GSoC/TestingReview

@@ -309 +309 @@
 = Comparison Note =
 
+== Selection Criteria ==
+
 
 The list is listed in selection priority order. In other words, CMock is considered to be the top competitive choice for this project. The priority is calculated basing on the following criteria:
@@ -322 +324 @@
 
  * The frist few criteria have the higher screening weight. The following ones are also very important. The xUnit architecture support is equivalently important in the sense that frameworks supporting xUnit architecture have edges on better handling relationship between test cases than frameworks that doesn't support.
-
-The RTEMS based tests are carried out with '''BSP=sis''' and '''CPU=sparc'''. For other CPUs and BSPs, further RTEMS based testing of converted current test suites would be simulated in future with the selected frameworks.
-
-'''Google Test and CxxUnit''' are testing frameworks with programming language C++, with the large set of self-produced libs and comprehensive testing functionalities, they are considered being too big to run for RTEMS based testing, with some cpus and bsps for RTEMS having only limited memory.
-
-Although '''mocking capability''' are compared between the frameworks, no mocking functions are constructed in the RTEMS-based test simulations temporarily.
-
-Even though all ten frameworks are compared in the above listed aspects, '''major simulation effort''' is concentrated on the top five. There is no need to simulate all of them if the test results for any top five framework is satisfiable.
-
-For '''host-based testing framework evaluation''', because host based tests are tests that does not rely on rtems APIs, I build and run the tests which are written in each framework with the purpose of test the framework itself. The screenshot are showed in each framework subpage. The screenshot is displayed only to compare the readability of the test output and amount of information contained in each framework.
+== Simulation Environment ==
+
+
+The RTEMS based tests are carried out with BSP=sis and CPU=sparc. For other CPUs and BSPs, further RTEMS based testing of converted current test suites would be simulated in future with the selected frameworks.
+== C++ Frameworks ==
+
+
+Google Test and CxxUnit are testing frameworks with programming language C++, with the large set of self-produced libs and comprehensive testing functionalities, they are considered being too big to run for RTEMS based testing, with some cpus and bsps for RTEMS having only limited memory.
+== Mock ==
+
+
+Although mocking capability are compared between the frameworks, no mocking functions are constructed in the RTEMS-based test simulations temporarily.
+== Simulation Effort ==
+
+
+Even though all ten frameworks are compared in the above listed aspects, major simulation effort is concentrated on the top five. There is no need to simulate all of them if the test results for any top five framework is satisfiable.
+== Host-based Testing ==
+
+
+For host-based testing framework evaluation, because host based tests are tests that does not rely on rtems APIs, I build and run the tests which are written in each framework with the purpose of test the framework itself. The screenshot are showed in each framework subpage. The screenshot is displayed only to compare the readability of the test output and amount of information contained in each framework.