#4108 closed defect (fixed)

Review minimum and ensure it really is a minimum configuration

Reported by: Joel Sherrill Owned by: Sebastian Huber
Priority: normal Milestone: 6.1
Component: test Version: 6
Severity: normal Keywords:
Cc: Blocked By:


Does minimum actually reflect what you think is the smallest possible configuration now? That as always the test's purpose -- to have a single that was the smallest we thought we could produce. It seems all your changes that it needs a review for tweaks to the configuration.

Inspecting the size of this test should tell you the smallest executable possible on this BSP with the current configuration settings.

There is a version in rtems-examples/misc which will either need to be synchronized or deleted.

This needs to be checked on 5 and 6.

Change History (3)

comment:1 Changed on 10/01/20 at 16:25:56 by Joel Sherrill

Owner: changed from joel@… to Sebastian Huber
Status: newassigned

comment:2 Changed on 10/01/20 at 17:08:50 by Sebastian Huber

Milestone: 5.26.1
Version: 56

comment:3 Changed on 09/08/22 at 14:29:37 by Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@…>

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

In 120c857e/rtems:

minimum: Do not use unified work areas

The CONFIGURE_UNIFIED_WORK_AREAS option pulls in a system initialization
handler which initializes the unified heap.

Close #4108.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.