#2276 closed enhancement (invalid)

Embed online javascript OpenRISC emulator (jor1k) to RTEMS wepbage

Reported by: Hesham Almatary Owned by: Amar Takhar
Priority: low Milestone: Indefinite
Component: tool/website Version: 4.11
Severity: normal Keywords: jor1k
Cc: Blocked By:
Blocking:

Change History (14)

comment:1 Changed on Feb 23, 2015 at 3:40:30 PM by Amar Takhar

I'm very weary of embedding anything remote on our site. I think a prominent / highlighted link is more suitable.

comment:2 Changed on Feb 23, 2015 at 6:57:02 PM by Hesham Almatary

Resolution: invalid
Status: newclosed

comment:3 Changed on Feb 24, 2015 at 2:28:01 PM by Gedare Bloom

Resolution: invalid
Status: closedreopened

I'd rather prefer to continue this discussion and see what we can do with it. Having a js simulator that runs RTEMS is pretty nice.

comment:4 Changed on Feb 24, 2015 at 2:28:40 PM by Gedare Bloom

Component: toolsweb
Milestone: 4.115.0
Version: 4.104.11

comment:5 Changed on Feb 24, 2015 at 2:32:18 PM by Amar Takhar

I'm not against linking to it, embedding it is a bad idea as it puts a service on our site that is out of our own control.

If the option to self-host exists we can do that.

comment:6 Changed on Feb 24, 2015 at 2:33:02 PM by Hesham Almatary

OK, AFAIK, all the javascript and jor1k simulator code is open source and at github, we can even have our own fork (that we can trust) and refer to it, if the current external jor1k would be an issue.

comment:7 Changed on Nov 9, 2017 at 6:26:42 AM by Sebastian Huber

Milestone: 5.06.1

Milestone renamed

comment:8 Changed on Oct 19, 2018 at 1:48:55 AM by Amar Takhar

This ticket is old do we still want this to happen? I'm okay if the answer is 'yes'.

comment:9 Changed on Oct 20, 2018 at 8:48:12 PM by Joel Sherrill

I have no idea if this simulator will even run our code. I am prone to want to close this as just something else to maintain. Unless someone sees how to get some publicity from it.

comment:10 Changed on Oct 20, 2018 at 9:16:12 PM by Amar Takhar

That's a large part of the reason why I asked if it's useful let's do it!

comment:11 Changed on Oct 20, 2018 at 9:44:19 PM by Joel Sherrill

Hesham.. does this simulator still work with RTEMS? Would it be worth writing instructions and linking to an external instance of it?

I hate to kill this idea as it seems cool and interesting but it is unlike anything we have done before.

comment:12 in reply to:  11 Changed on Oct 20, 2018 at 9:55:47 PM by Chris Johns

Milestone: 6.1Indefinite

Replying to Joel Sherrill:

Hesham.. does this simulator still work with RTEMS? Would it be worth writing instructions and linking to an external instance of it?

I hate to kill this idea as it seems cool and interesting but it is unlike anything we have done before.

This is not need for 5.1 or even 6.1. I have made the milestone indefinite.

comment:13 in reply to:  11 Changed on Oct 22, 2018 at 8:13:53 AM by Hesham Almatary

Replying to Joel Sherrill:

Hesham.. does this simulator still work with RTEMS? Would it be worth writing instructions and linking to an external instance of it?

I hate to kill this idea as it seems cool and interesting but it is unlike anything we have done before.

Now sure as I haven't used the port since 2015. I could probably give it a try this week. However, I wouldn't make it block any releases

comment:14 Changed on Dec 5, 2018 at 3:40:41 AM by Amar Takhar

Resolution: invalid
Status: reopenedclosed

I'm going to go ahead and close this if we figure out in the future this will be really handy to have then let's do it!

Don't hesitate to create a new ticket with the latest information I'm happy to get this going!

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.