![[RTEMS Logo]](/images/logo.png){kind=logo}
Opened on 02/23/15 at 14:39:40
Closed on 12/05/18 at 03:40:41
#2276 closed enhancement (invalid)
Embed online javascript OpenRISC emulator (jor1k) to RTEMS wepbage
| Reported by: | Hesham Almatary | Owned by: | Amar Takhar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | low | Milestone: | Indefinite |
| Component: | tool/website | Version: | 4.11 |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | jor1k |
| Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
| Blocking: |
Description
It would be nice if we can embed the javascript OpenRISC emulator (jor1k) [1] [2] on the project page [3] or the simulators page [4].
[1] https://github.com/s-macke/jor1k
[2] http://s-macke.github.io/jor1k/demos/rtems.html
[3] https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Projects/GSoC/OpenRISC
[4] https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/TBR/UserManual/Simulators
Change History (14)
comment:1 Changed on 02/23/15 at 15:40:30 by Amar Takhar
comment:2 Changed on 02/23/15 at 18:57:02 by Hesham Almatary
| Resolution: | → invalid |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:3 Changed on 02/24/15 at 14:28:01 by Gedare Bloom
| Resolution: | invalid |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
I'd rather prefer to continue this discussion and see what we can do with it. Having a js simulator that runs RTEMS is pretty nice.
comment:4 Changed on 02/24/15 at 14:28:40 by Gedare Bloom
| Component: | tools → web |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | 4.11 → 5.0 |
| Version: | 4.10 → 4.11 |
comment:5 Changed on 02/24/15 at 14:32:18 by Amar Takhar
I'm not against linking to it, embedding it is a bad idea as it puts a service on our site that is out of our own control.
If the option to self-host exists we can do that.
comment:6 Changed on 02/24/15 at 14:33:02 by Hesham Almatary
OK, AFAIK, all the javascript and jor1k simulator code is open source and at github, we can even have our own fork (that we can trust) and refer to it, if the current external jor1k would be an issue.
comment:8 Changed on 10/19/18 at 01:48:55 by Amar Takhar
This ticket is old do we still want this to happen? I'm okay if the answer is 'yes'.
comment:9 Changed on 10/20/18 at 20:48:12 by Joel Sherrill
I have no idea if this simulator will even run our code. I am prone to want to close this as just something else to maintain. Unless someone sees how to get some publicity from it.
comment:10 Changed on 10/20/18 at 21:16:12 by Amar Takhar
That's a large part of the reason why I asked if it's useful let's do it!
comment:11 follow-ups: 12 13 Changed on 10/20/18 at 21:44:19 by Joel Sherrill
Hesham.. does this simulator still work with RTEMS? Would it be worth writing instructions and linking to an external instance of it?
I hate to kill this idea as it seems cool and interesting but it is unlike anything we have done before.
comment:12 Changed on 10/20/18 at 21:55:47 by Chris Johns
| Milestone: | 6.1 → Indefinite |
|---|
Replying to Joel Sherrill:
Hesham.. does this simulator still work with RTEMS? Would it be worth writing instructions and linking to an external instance of it?
I hate to kill this idea as it seems cool and interesting but it is unlike anything we have done before.
This is not need for 5.1 or even 6.1. I have made the milestone indefinite.
comment:13 Changed on 10/22/18 at 08:13:53 by Hesham Almatary
Replying to Joel Sherrill:
Hesham.. does this simulator still work with RTEMS? Would it be worth writing instructions and linking to an external instance of it?
I hate to kill this idea as it seems cool and interesting but it is unlike anything we have done before.
Now sure as I haven't used the port since 2015. I could probably give it a try this week. However, I wouldn't make it block any releases
comment:14 Changed on 12/05/18 at 03:40:41 by Amar Takhar
| Resolution: | → invalid |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
I'm going to go ahead and close this if we figure out in the future this will be really handy to have then let's do it!
Don't hesitate to create a new ticket with the latest information I'm happy to get this going!
I'm very weary of embedding anything remote on our site. I think a prominent / highlighted link is more suitable.