Opened on 12/08/14 at 15:09:07
Closed on 12/12/14 at 15:39:48
#2211 closed defect (fixed)
warnings in mpc8xx BSPs
Reported by: | Joel Sherrill | Owned by: | Sebastian Huber |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | 4.11 |
Component: | bsps | Version: | 4.10 |
Severity: | blocker | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
Blocking: |
Description
Assigning this to Sebastian since Thomas doesn't have an account.
The mpc8xx BSPs now account for 9 of the top 10 in the "warnings per BSP" list.
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed on 12/12/14 at 14:33:06 by Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@…>
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 Changed on 12/12/14 at 14:38:35 by Joel Sherrill
Notice the heading says "mpx8xx" not mbx8xx. I think other mpc8xx BSPs got the same code as a baseline. Does your patch account for all these BSP variants?
7 powerpc-t32mppc (inBSP=4 inLibCPU=1)
20 powerpc-mbx821_001 (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
20 powerpc-mbx821_002b (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
20 powerpc-mbx821_002 (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
20 powerpc-mbx860_001b (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
20 powerpc-mbx860_002 (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
20 powerpc-mbx860_1b (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
20 powerpc-pghplus (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
20 powerpc-tqm8xx_stk8xx (inBSP=18 inLibCPU=0)
24 powerpc-mbx860_005b (inBSP=22 inLibCPU=0)
79 powerpc-gwlcfm (inBSP=16 inLibCPU=61)
These are before your patch. I am starting a new build sweep now.
comment:3 Changed on 12/12/14 at 14:41:16 by Sebastian Huber
Oh, I really hate this libcpu. I will fix the other BSPs.
comment:4 Changed on 12/12/14 at 15:22:59 by Joel Sherrill
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
comment:5 Changed on 12/12/14 at 15:39:48 by Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@…>
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | reopened → closed |
In 3507f3f953cb9be14eea8bf3d03b6e29bba51b98/rtems: