Changeset fe68c62 in rtems-testing


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 7, 2009, 10:46:06 PM (10 years ago)
Author:
Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@…>
Branches:
4.11, 8895273c193787f84c4585a10f6d6aceb3b25dc4
Children:
4b7a313
Parents:
c198584
Message:

2009-07-07 Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@…>

  • Explanations.txt: objectshrinkinformation.c covered with reworked loop from Chris Johns.
Location:
rtems-coverage
Files:
2 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • rtems-coverage/ChangeLog

    rc198584 rfe68c62  
     12009-07-07      Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com>
     2
     3        * Explanations.txt: objectshrinkinformation.c covered with reworked
     4        loop from Chris Johns.
     5
    162009-07-07      Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com>
    27
  • rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt

    rc198584 rfe68c62  
    250250Simple Test Case
    251251looks like shrink block but so small the unused area gets freed
    252 +++
    253 
    254 objectshrinkinformation.c:101
    255 Talk To Chris
    256 This code needs to be explained by Chris and possibly restructured.
    257 I think this is possibly dead code where a branch case cannot actually
    258 be taken because it is redundant.  But more than than that, I am not
    259 100% sure the code is correct. I am unsure how the loop ensures that
    260 all objects within an allocation block are verified as being free.
    261252+++
    262253
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.