Changeset c349398 in rtems-testing


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 21, 2010, 4:52:34 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
Jennifer Averett <Jennifer.Averett@…>
Branches:
4.11, 8895273c193787f84c4585a10f6d6aceb3b25dc4
Children:
dc060fe
Parents:
cc67fa7
Message:

2010-06-21 Jennifer Averett <Jennifer.Averett@…>

  • Explanations.txt: Removed explanations that were resolved.
File:
1 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt

    rcc67fa7 rc349398  
    1 pthread.c:1149
    2 Simple Test Case
    3 This is a case of attempting to change the priority of a thread
    4 whose priority is above that of the "high" priority it is supposed
    5 to have.  This is just a matter of having a thread at a high priority
    6 when its budget runs out.
    7 
    8 There is another case of a branch not taken which is actually
    9 when the thread is holding a resource and we do not want to bump
    10 its priority.
    11 
    12 So there are actually two cases which could branch here.
    13 +++
    14 
    15 threadinitialize.c:100
    16 Simple Test Case
    17 This is for the case where the application uses the POSIX
    18 thread stack address attribute.
    19 
    20 NOTE: Code Should be Configured on POSIX
    21 +++
    22 
    231bspcmdline_getparam.c:67
    242Simple Test Case
     
    264+++
    275
    28 bspcmdline_getparamrhs.c:48
     6bspcmdline_getparamrhs.c:36
    297Simple Test Case
    308Need a test case to return NULL.  This looks like a parameter of the form
     
    3210+++
    3311
    34 fifo.c:170
    35 Simple Test Case
    36 This looks like an existing test is broken or is only testing error paths.
    37 +++
    38 
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.