Changeset 994202a in rtems

Timestamp:

Jun 16, 2000, 1:00:42 PM (21 years ago)

Author:

Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@…>

Branches:

4.10, 4.11, 4.8, 4.9, 5, master

Children:

3207f0a

Parents:

fc6eaee

Message:

Patch rtems-rc-20000615-4-cvs.diff from Ralf Corsepius
<corsepiu@…> to fix the following:

• lib/configure.in actually is libc's configure.in, so let it depend on libc not on lib [In my Cygnus/GNU configuration scheme, lib/include and lib/libc are treated as one unit, while libcpu and libbsp are treated as separate units.]

• Allow empty --enable-bare* flags for the bare bsp. The formerly used scheme is too strict for our multilib experiments.

Location:

c

Files:

• configure.in (modified) (1 diff)
• src/lib/configure.in (modified) (1 diff)
• src/lib/libbsp/configure.in (modified) (1 diff)

c/configure.in

@@ -36 +36 @@
       bare)
         bspcpudir=
-        if test "X${BARE_CPU_CFLAGS}" = "X" ; then
-          AC_MSG_ERROR([--enable-bare-cpu-cflags not specified for bare bsp])
-        fi
-        if test "X${BARE_CPU_MODEL}" = "X" ; then
-          AC_MSG_ERROR([--enable-bare-cpu-model not specified for bare bsp])
-        fi
         ;;
       *)

c/src/lib/configure.in

@@ -4 +4 @@
 
 AC_PREREQ(2.13)
-AC_INIT(libbsp)
+AC_INIT(libc)
 RTEMS_TOP(../../..)
 AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR(../../..)

c/src/lib/libbsp/configure.in

@@ -29 +29 @@
 # Is there code where there should be for this BSP?
 # The bare bsp is a special case as it is not under the RTEMS_CPU path
-case $bspdir in
-  bare)
-    bspcpudir=
-    if test "X${BARE_CPU_CFLAGS}" = "X" ; then
-      AC_MSG_ERROR([--enable-bare-cpu-cflags not specified for bare bsp])
-    fi
-    if test "X${BARE_CPU_MODEL}" = "X" ; then
-      AC_MSG_ERROR([--enable-bare-cpu-model not specified for bare bsp])
-    fi
-    ;;
-  *)
-    bspcpudir=$RTEMS_CPU/
-    ;;
-esac
-
-if test "$RTEMS_BSP" = "bare" ; then
+if test "$bspdir" = "bare" ; then
   RTEMS_LIBBSP_CPU_SUBDIR="bare"
 else