Changeset 8b87982 in rtems-testing


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Aug 1, 2009, 10:00:30 PM (10 years ago)
Author:
Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@…>
Branches:
4.11, 8895273c193787f84c4585a10f6d6aceb3b25dc4
Children:
d7e5626
Parents:
aa8916c
Message:

2009-08-01 Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@…>

  • Explanations.txt: Update and enhance sporadic scheduler case.
Location:
rtems-coverage
Files:
2 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • rtems-coverage/ChangeLog

    raa8916c r8b87982  
     12009-08-01      Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com>
     2
     3        * Explanations.txt: Update and enhance sporadic scheduler case.
     4
    152009-07-31      Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com>
    26
  • rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt

    raa8916c r8b87982  
    2525+++
    2626
    27 pthread.c:83
    28 Simple Test Case
    29 This is a case of the sporadic scheduling budget being less than one clock
    30 tick in length.
    31 +++
    32 
    33 pthread.c:97
    34 Simple Test Case
    35 This is a case of the sporadic scheduling replenish period being less
    36 than one clock tick in length.
    37 +++
    38 
    3927pthread.c:129
    4028Simple Test Case
    4129This is a case of attempting to change the priority of a thread
    42 holding resources at the end of the sporadic server period.
     30whose priority is above that of the "high" priority it is supposed
     31to have.  This is just a matter of having a thread at a high priority
     32when its budget runs out.
    4333+++
    4434
    4535pthread.c:130
    4636Simple Test Case
    47 It looks like we don't have a good sporadic server test.  This is
    48 the normal case of changing priority.
     37This is 1/2 of pthread.c:129.
    4938+++
    5039
     
    6150+++
    6251
    63 heapresizeblock.c:158
    64 Simple Test Case
    65 looks like shrink block but so small the unused area gets freed
    66 +++
    67 
    6852heapallocatealigned.c:223
    6953Simple Test Case
    7054This looks like a case where the allocate aligned simply fails to get any
    7155memory.
    72 +++
    73 
    74 heapwalk.c:144
    75 Test Case
    76 We are not hitting the case for having an error at this place.  I would have
    77 thought that making do_dump 0 and running all the cases is enough.  Maybe the
    78 test does not do what I think and this is why this case is missed.
    7956+++
    8057
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.