Changeset 6a10709 in rtems for c/src/exec

Timestamp:
03/31/99 22:33:14 (25 years ago)
Author:
Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@…>
Branches:
4.10, 4.11, 4.8, 4.9, 5, master
Children:
f470989
Parents:
5c95996
Message:

Patch from Chris Johns <ccj@…>:

joel@… wrote:

Chris,

sp09 fails on the rtems_port_delete(0) call. This is supposed to give an
invalid id error. I can't find any changes other than the unlimited
objects patch which would have tripped this so would appreciate it if you
could look into it. I suspect that this is a side-effect of the unlimited
objects patch.

It is me.

Basically, there are 0 ports configured in sp09. The test ends up
dereferecing NULL in local_table[0] and comes up with a non-NULL invalid
pointer.

The issue is not actually allocating a local_table for an object type
which has a maximum value of 0. I cannot remember the exact workings of
the id values and the local_table. I might have changed the nature from
the pre-unlimited change. As you know the id's are an interesting game
where performance is most important.

I know the problem could be solved by adding a check for index == 0. But
I hate to slow this path down. I think you may have changed the way the
object information structure gets initialized.


This change lets the unlimited and sp09 tests run on the posix Linux
BSP. A static local variable `null_local_table' has been added. This
variable is always set to NULL. The `local_table' element of the
information structure is set to point to this variable earily in the
initialisation. If the object type has more than 0 elements the
`local_table' element is updated. All object types which have 0 elements
reference `null_local_table'. This change fixes the problem sp09 found
yet does not add any extra processing to the critical
`_Objects_Get_local_object' function.


(No files)

Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.