Changeset 168c675 in rtems-testing


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 9, 2009, 6:58:01 PM (10 years ago)
Author:
Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@…>
Branches:
4.11, 8895273c193787f84c4585a10f6d6aceb3b25dc4
Children:
a431462
Parents:
3777295
Message:

2009-07-09 Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@…>

  • Explanations.txt: Timespec divide by zero covered by sp58. spthreadq01 covers extracting a thread which is not blocked on a thread queue. Rewrite explanation of threadqueuefirstpriority.c.
Location:
rtems-coverage
Files:
2 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
  • rtems-coverage/ChangeLog

    r3777295 r168c675  
     12009-07-09      Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com>
     2
     3        * Explanations.txt: Timespec divide by zero covered by sp58.
     4        spthreadq01 covers extracting a thread which is not blocked on a
     5        thread queue. Rewrite explanation of threadqueuefirstpriority.c.
     6
    172009-07-09      Joel Sherrill <joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com>
    28
  • rtems-coverage/Explanations.txt

    r3777295 r168c675  
    389389+++
    390390
    391 threadqextractfifo.c:55
    392 Simple Test Case
    393 extract thread that isn't blocked on thread queue.  Probably requires
    394 bypassing APIs and going to SuperCode directly. Hard if API not bypassed.
    395 +++
    396 
    397 threadqextractpriority.c:64
    398 Simple Test Case
    399 extract thread that isn't blocked on thread queue.  Probably requires
    400 bypassing APIs and going to SuperCode directly. Hard if API not bypassed.
    401 +++
    402 
    403391threadqfirstpriority.c:51
    404392Simple Test Case
    405 Ask for first priority on a thread queue with no tasks.  May require
    406 bypassing APIs and going to SuperCode directly. Hard if API not bypassed.
     393Ask for first priority on a thread queue with a task ONLY on the 4th
     394priority chain.  This will require a test that has priorities in the
     395lowest 1/4 of 256.  This should be able to be done by having a new
     396Region test which has a single task of appropriate priority blocked
     397on the Region when we attempt to delete it.
    407398+++
    408399
     
    421412+++
    422413
    423 timespecdivide.c:44
    424 Simple Test Case
    425 Will probably have to bypass the APIs but this is a divide by zero case.
    426 +++
    427 
    428414watchdogadjusttochain.c:42
    429415Simple Test Case?
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.