Opened on 11/10/15 at 08:23:30
Last modified on 02/15/17 at 14:20:42
#2463 assigned defect
rtems-syms assumes that 4.11 tools are installed
Reported by: | Sebastian Huber | Owned by: | Needs Funding |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | Indefinite |
Component: | tool | Version: | 5 |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Blocked By: | ||
Blocking: |
Description
For example:
gmake[7]: Entering directory `/scratch/git-rtems-testing/rtems/build-arm-realview_pbx_a9_qemu-rtems/arm-rtems4.12/c/realview_pbx_a9_qemu/testsuites/libtests/dl01' arm-rtems4.12-gcc -B../../../../../realview_pbx_a9_qemu/lib/ -specs bsp_specs -qrtems -march=armv7-a -mthumb -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -mtune=cortex-a9 -O0 -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wimplicit-function-declaration -Wstrict-prototypes -Wnested-externs -march=armv7-a -mthumb -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -mtune=cortex-a9 -o dl01.pre.exe init.o dl-load.o dl-tar.o arm-rtems4.12-nm -g -n dl01.pre.exe > dl01.pre.num arm-rtems4.12-size dl01.pre.exe text data bss dec hex filename 233464 1820 267135168 267370452 fefbfd4 dl01.pre.exe cp dl01.pre.exe dl01.pre.ralf rm -f dl01.pre.ralf mv dl01.pre.exe dl01.pre rtems-syms -e -c "-march=armv7-a -mthumb -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -mtune=cortex-a9 -O0 -g -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wimplicit-function-declaration -Wstrict-prototypes -Wnested-externs" -o dl-sym.o dl01.pre : error trying to exec 'arm-rtems4.11-gcc': execvp: No such file or directory error: compiling wrapper: Compiler error gmake[7]: *** [dl-sym.o] Error 10
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed on 11/11/15 at 00:15:23 by Chris Johns
comment:2 follow-up: 3 Changed on 11/11/15 at 00:16:19 by Chris Johns
Why do we have arm-rtems4.11-gcc rather than arm-rtems-gcc?
comment:3 follow-up: 4 Changed on 11/11/15 at 06:58:08 by Sebastian Huber
comment:4 Changed on 11/11/15 at 07:48:23 by Chris Johns
Replying to sebastian.huber:
Replying to chrisj:
Why do we have arm-rtems4.11-gcc rather than arm-rtems-gcc?
See #2377.
Haha yes I remember now. I have been thinking about the original reason and that was RPM files built and installing in to a common prefix. With the RSB we have moved to using different prefix paths and this makes the version number in the tool name redundant.
comment:5 Changed on 02/15/17 at 14:20:42 by Sebastian Huber
Milestone: | 4.12 → Indefinite |
---|---|
Owner: | set to Needs Funding |
Status: | new → assigned |
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
If we use 4.11 tools for 4.12 then this error is expected.
We could provide the version number on the command line and it would not matter.